Tag Archives: Bill Clinton

Call Now: 877-352-0773

She’s A Madwomen And A Murderer? Hillary Clinton’s Policies Has Turned the Middle East into a Killing Field?

Middle East ‘Regime Change’ Madness. “Hillary Clinton’s Policies Has Turned the Middle East into a Killing Field”

By Gareth Porter

Hillary Clinton’s “regime change” policies as Secretary of State helped spread the chaos that has turned the Middle East into a killing field and might have done even worse if not for extraordinary obstructions from the Pentagon’s Joint Chiefs of Staff regarding Syria, as Gareth Porter recounts at Middle East Eye.

Seymour Hersh’s recent revelations about an effort by the U.S. military leadership in 2013 to bolster the Syrian army against jihadist forces in Syria shed important new light on the internal bureaucratic politics surrounding regime change in U.S. Middle East policy. Hersh’s account makes it clear that the Obama administration’s policy of regime change in both Libya and Syria provoked pushback from the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS).

That account and another report on a similar episode in 2011 suggest that the U.S. military has a range of means by which it can oppose administration policies that it regards as unacceptable. But it also shows that the military leadership failed to alter the course of U.S. policy, and raises the question whether it was willing to use all the means available to stop the funneling of arms to al-Nusra Front and other extremist groups in Syria.

Ousted Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi shortly before he was murdered on Oct. 20, 2011.

Ousted Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi shortly before he was murdered on Oct. 20, 2011.

Hersh details a JCS initiative in the summer of 2013 to share intelligence on Islamic State and al-Qaeda organizations with other German, Russian and Israeli militaries, in the belief that the information would find its way to the Syrian army. Hersh reports that the military leadership did not inform the White House and the State Department about the “military to military” intelligence sharing on the jihadist forces in Syria, reflecting the hardball bureaucratic politics practiced within the national security institutions.

The 2013 initiative, approved by JCS chairman, General Martin Dempsey, was not the first active effort by the U.S. military to mitigate Obama administration regime change policies. In 2011, the JCS had been strongly opposed to the effort to depose the Muammar Gaddafi regime in Libya, a regime-change effort led by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

When the Obama administration began its effort to overthrow Gaddafi, it did not call publicly for regime change and instead asserted that it was merely seeking to avert mass killings that administration officials had suggested might approach genocidal levels. But the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), which had been given the lead role in assessing the situation in Libya, found no evidence to support such fears and concluded that it was based on nothing more than “speculative arguments.”

The JCS warned that overthrowing the Gaddafi regime would serve no U.S. security interest, but would instead open the way for forces aligned with al-Qaeda to take over the country. After the Obama administration went ahead with a NATO air assault against the Gaddafi regime the U.S. military sought to head off the destruction of the entire Libyan government.

General Carter Ham, the commander of AFRICOM, the U.S. regional command for Africa, gave the State Department a proposal for a ceasefire to which Gaddafi had agreed. It would have resulted in Gaddafi’s resignation but retain the Libyan military’s capacity to hold off jihadist forces and rescind the sanctions against Gaddafi’s family.

But the State Department refused any negotiation with Gaddafi on the proposal. Immediately after hearing that Gaddafi had been captured by rebel forces and killed, Clinton famously joked in a television interview, “We came, we saw, he died” and laughed.

By then the administration was already embarked on yet another regime change policy in Syria. Although Clinton led the public advocacy of the policy, then CIA Director David Petraeus, who had taken over the agency in early September 2011, was a major ally. He immediately began working on a major covert operation to arm rebel forces in Syria.

The CIA operation used ostensibly independent companies in Libya to ship arms from Libyan government warehouses to Syria and southern Turkey. These were then distributed in consultation with the United States through networks run by Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia. The plan went into operation within days of Gaddafi’s death on October 20, 2011, just before NATO officially ended its operation at the end of that month, as the DIA later reported to the JCS.

But the result of the operation was to accelerate the dominance of al-Qaeda and their Islamist allies. The Turks, Qataris and Saudis were funneling arms to al-Qaeda’s Syrian franchise, al-Nusra Front, or other closely related extremist groups. That should not have surprised the Obama administration. The same thing had happened in Libya in spring 2011 after the Obama administration had endorsed a Qatari plan to send arms to Libyan rebels. The White House had quickly learned that the Qataris had sent the arms to the most extremist elements in the Libyan opposition.

The original Petraeus covert operation ended with the torching of the U.S. consulate in Benghazi in September 2012 in which Ambassador Christopher Stevens was killed. It was superseded by a new program under which Qatar and Saudi Arabia financed the transfer of weapons from other sources that were supposed to be distributed in cooperation with CIA officials at a base in southern Turkey.

But “thousands of tons of weapons” were still going to groups fighting alongside the jihadists or who actually joined them as Vice President Joe Biden revealed in 2014.

By spring 2013, al-Nusra Front and its Islamic extremist allies were already in control of wide areas in the north and in the Damascus suburbs. The Islamic State had separated from al-Nusra Front and established its own territory south of the Turkish border. The secular armed opposition had ceased to exist as a significant force.

The “Free Syrian Army”, the nominal command of those forces, was actually a fiction within Syria, as was reported by specialists on the Syrian conflict. But despite the absence of a real “moderate opposition,” the Obama administration continued to support the flood of arms to the forces fighting to overthrow Assad.

In mid-2013, as Hersh recounts, the DIA issued an intelligence assessment warning that the administration’s regime change policy might well result in a repeat of what was already happening in Libya: chaos and jihadist domination. The JCS also pulled off a clever maneuver to ensure that the jihadists and their allies were getting only obsolete weapons. A JCS representative convinced the CIA to obtain much cheaper arms from Turkish stocks controlled by officials sympathetic to the CIA’s viewpoint on Syria.

But the JCS failed to alter the administration’s policy of continuing to support the flow of arms into Syria. Did the military leadership really use all of its leverage to oppose the policy?

In 2013, some officials on the U.S. National Security Council staff pushed for a relatively modest form of pressure on Qatar to get it to back off its continued supply of arms to extremists, including al-Nusra Front, by pulling out a U.S. fighter squadron from the U.S. air base at al-Udeid in Qatar. But as the Wall Street Journal reported earlier this year, the Pentagon, obviously reflecting the JCS position, vetoed the proposal, arguing that the forward headquarters of the Central Command at the airbase was “vital” to U.S. operations in the Middle East.

The political implications of the episode are clear: bureaucratic self-interest trumped the military’s conviction that U.S. security is being endangered. No matter how strongly the JCS may have felt about the recklessness of administration policy, they were not prepared to sacrifice their access to military bases in Qatar, Saudi Arabia or Turkey to pressure their Middle Eastern allies.

Gareth Porter is an independent investigative journalist and winner of the 2012 Gellhorn Prize for journalism. He is the author of the newly published Manufactured Crisis: The Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare. [This article originally appeared at Middle East Eye,http://www.middleeasteye.net/columns/us-military-leadership-s-resistance-regime-change-1343405723#sthash.RtsyxSes.dpuf]

Article Source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/middle-east-regime-change-madness-hillary-clintons-policies-has-turned-the-middle-east-into-a-killing-field/5499389

Related Video: Hillary Clinton Murders


Related Video: SEX! DRUGS! MURDER! The Secret Lives of Hillary (and Bill) Clinton w/ Victor Thorn

Related Video: The Clinton Chronicles: Bill and Hillary Exposed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DSzcdCv8_s

Popular Media From The Web

Call Now: 877-881-5420

Top Trending News From The Web

Music Promotion - Music By The Truth Tale (Some Songs Maybe PG)

Clinton Scandals: Hillary Clinton Heckled Over Bill Clinton’s Sex Scandals

Hillary Clinton heckled over Bill Clinton’s sex scandals

Hillary Clinton on Sunday was interrupted by a female heckler during the Democratic candidate's first campaign event of the new year in New Hampshire.
Hillary Clinton on Sunday was interrupted by a female heckler during the Democratic candidate’s first campaign event of the new year in New Hampshire.

A Republican state representative from New Hampshire heckled Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton during a campaign event over former President Bill Clinton’s sexual scandals.

When Clinton began taking questions at a Derry town hall, Katherine Prudhomme O’Brien, a GOP state representative from Rockingham, New Hampshire, stood up and began shouting at Clinton.

After Clinton ignored the protestor once, O’Brien began yelling again during another pause in the town hall meeting.

“You are very rude, and I’m not ever going to call on you,” Clinton said forcefully, looking directly at the woman. “Thank you.”

O’Brien’s shouts were inaudible to reporters and most in the audience. It’s unclear if Clinton was able to understand what she was saying.

After the event, the lawmaker said she was trying to ask the Democratic frontrunner about her husband’s sexual impropriety decades ago.

O’Brien said she used to be a Democrat but became a Republican because of what she saw happen in “the Clinton years.”

This is not the first time the former secretary of state has been directly questioned about her husband’s indecent behavior.

A woman asked her last month about Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey and Paula Jones, women who have accused Bill Clinton of sexual impropriety.

Republican front-runner Donald Trump has launched new attacks against the Clintons in recent weeks, calling the former president “one of the great abusers of the world.”

Trump said last week that Bill Clinton is considered a reasonable target for criticism because of his alleged sexual affairs with Monica Lewinsky, Paula Jones and the “many” other women.

The billionaire businessman also stated that Hillary Clinton, though she plays the “women card,” isn’t very popular among voters of her gender.

Source: http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2016/01/04/444465/heckle-Katherine-Prudhomme-OBrien/

Popular Media From The Web

Call Now: 877-881-5420

Top Trending News From The Web

Music Promotion - Music By The Truth Tale (Some Songs Maybe PG)

Donald Trump: Ex-President Bill Clinton ‘one of the great abusers of the world’

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks to guests at a campaign rally on December 21, 2015 in Grand Rapids, Michigan. (AFP photo)
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks to guests at a campaign rally on December 21, 2015 in Grand Rapids, Michigan. (AFP photo)
 

US Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has launched new attacks against his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, as well as her husband, former President Bill Clinton, calling him “one of the great abusers of the world.”

“She [Hillary] wants to accuse me of things. And the husband’s one of the great abusers of the world. Give me a break,” Trump told a crowd in South Carolina on Wednesday.

“She came out saying [Trump] has a ‘penchant for sexism’… now she is playing with that card,” Trump explained. “I had no choice, but I had to mention her husband’s situation,” a reference to Bill Clinton’s previous sexual relationships during his political career.

The billionaire businessman also stated that Clinton, though she plays the “women card,” isn’t very popular among voters of her gender.

“I’ll tell you who doesn’t like Hillary,” he told the crowd. “Women don’t like Hillary. I see it all the time.”

Former US President Clinton with wife Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in Ames, Iowa, on November 15, 2015.

Tensions have been growing between the two leading candidates in recent days, stemming from Trump’s recent comment that Clinton “got [expletive]” during the 2008 presidential election, when she lost to President Barack Obama.

Clinton then accused Trump of having “a penchant for sexism.”

Since he joined the 2016 White House race in mid-June, Trump’s campaign has been marked by controversial statements, including disparaging remarks about Muslims and Mexican immigrants.

Last month, the billionaire real estate tycoon proposed banning Muslims from entering the US, drawing widespread condemnation both domestically and internationally.

Trump, whose mother immigrated from Scotland and paternal grandparents immigrated from Germany, has also called for deporting all undocumented immigrants from the United States.

Related Video: SEX! DRUGS! MURDER! The Secret Lives of Hillary (and Bill) Clinton w/ Victor Thorn

Related Video: THE CLINTON CONSPIRACY – MUST WATCH
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8B43JOshC4
Related Video: Exposed: Hillary Clinton’s Sex Scandals

Related Video: Why The Jews Love Hillary

Popular Media From The Web

Call Now: 877-881-5420

Top Trending News From The Web

Music Promotion - Music By The Truth Tale (Some Songs Maybe PG)